🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger group of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a previous ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities assert that local officers have control of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”